Chinese Journal OF Rice Science ›› 2018, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5): 485-492.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2018.7123
• 研究论文 • Previous Articles Next Articles
Su CHEN1, Jiankun XIE1, Wenxin HUANG2, Dengyun CHEN3, Xiaojian PENG4, Xueqin FU1,*()
Received:
2017-10-10
Revised:
2017-12-15
Online:
2018-09-10
Published:
2018-09-10
Contact:
Xueqin FU
陈苏1, 谢建坤1, 黄文新2, 陈登云3, 彭晓剑4, 付学琴1,*()
通讯作者:
付学琴
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Su CHEN, Jiankun XIE, Wenxin HUANG, Dengyun CHEN, Xiaojian PENG, Xueqin FU. Effects of Plant Growth-promoting Rhizobacteria(PGPR) on Physiological Characteristics of Rice Under Drought Stress[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2018, 32(5): 485-492.
陈苏, 谢建坤, 黄文新, 陈登云, 彭晓剑, 付学琴. 根际促生细菌对干旱胁迫下水稻生理特性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2018, 32(5): 485-492.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.ricesci.cn/EN/10.16819/j.1001-7216.2018.7123
干旱处理 Drought stress | 光合速率 Photosynthetic rate/(µmol·m-2s-1) | 气孔导度 Stomatal conductance/(mmol·m-2s-1) | 胞间CO2浓度 Intercellular CO2 concentration/(µmol·mol-1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NP | F06 | NP | F06 | NP | F06 | |||
CK | 27.25±1.26 a | 28.71±2.84 a | 256.69±11.54 a | 283.32±12.67 a | 227.18±29.89 bc | 229.12±14.20 b | ||
LD | 25.94±2.02 ab | 27.93±1.16 a | 234.35±18.90 a | 261.33±10.18 a | 191.78±16.34 c | 216.05±11.32 b | ||
MD | 23.06±1.37 b | 26.05±3.12 ab | 195.17±15.27 b | 227.62±23.14 b | 235.22±10.71 b | 209.38±18.17 c | ||
SD | 18.91±1.18 c | 22.34±2.41 b | 165.28±20.77 c | 193.49±15.63 c | 268.53±21.44 a | 252.68±8.95 a |
Table 1 Effects of different treatments on photosynthetic parameters of rice leaves.
干旱处理 Drought stress | 光合速率 Photosynthetic rate/(µmol·m-2s-1) | 气孔导度 Stomatal conductance/(mmol·m-2s-1) | 胞间CO2浓度 Intercellular CO2 concentration/(µmol·mol-1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NP | F06 | NP | F06 | NP | F06 | |||
CK | 27.25±1.26 a | 28.71±2.84 a | 256.69±11.54 a | 283.32±12.67 a | 227.18±29.89 bc | 229.12±14.20 b | ||
LD | 25.94±2.02 ab | 27.93±1.16 a | 234.35±18.90 a | 261.33±10.18 a | 191.78±16.34 c | 216.05±11.32 b | ||
MD | 23.06±1.37 b | 26.05±3.12 ab | 195.17±15.27 b | 227.62±23.14 b | 235.22±10.71 b | 209.38±18.17 c | ||
SD | 18.91±1.18 c | 22.34±2.41 b | 165.28±20.77 c | 193.49±15.63 c | 268.53±21.44 a | 252.68±8.95 a |
干旱处理 Drought stress | 初始荧光 PSⅡ original fluorescence(Fo) | 最大光化学效率 Maximum photochemical efficiency(Fv/Fm) | 光化学猝灭系数 Photochemical quenching Coefficient(qP) | 非光化学猝灭系数 Non-photochemical quenching Coefficient(NPQ) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NP | F06 | NP | F06 | NP | F06 | NP | F06 | ||||
CK | 149.06±9.78 d | 150.18±12.62 c | 0.89±0.04 a | 0.90±0.03 a | 0.75±0.04 a | 0.75±0.02 a | 1.70±0.04 c | 1.70±0.06 c | |||
LD | 162.19±12.78 c | 154.44±19.41 bc | 0.80±0.01 ab | 0.86±0.02 ab | 0.64±0.02 ab | 0.63±0.02 b | 1.77±0.05 b | 1.76±0.05 c | |||
MD | 178.34±14.21 b | 167.06±10.89 b | 0.73±0.02 b | 0.79±0.01 b | 0.60±0.02 b | 0.52±0.03 c | 1.80±0.03 b | 1.98±0.03 b | |||
SD | 192.18±16.74 a | 178.03±11.36 a | 0.52±0.01 c | 0.61±0.02 c | 0.51±0.01 c | 0.38±0.00 d | 2.06±0.07 a | 2.24±0.06 a |
Table 2 Effect of different treatments on chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of rice leaves.
干旱处理 Drought stress | 初始荧光 PSⅡ original fluorescence(Fo) | 最大光化学效率 Maximum photochemical efficiency(Fv/Fm) | 光化学猝灭系数 Photochemical quenching Coefficient(qP) | 非光化学猝灭系数 Non-photochemical quenching Coefficient(NPQ) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NP | F06 | NP | F06 | NP | F06 | NP | F06 | ||||
CK | 149.06±9.78 d | 150.18±12.62 c | 0.89±0.04 a | 0.90±0.03 a | 0.75±0.04 a | 0.75±0.02 a | 1.70±0.04 c | 1.70±0.06 c | |||
LD | 162.19±12.78 c | 154.44±19.41 bc | 0.80±0.01 ab | 0.86±0.02 ab | 0.64±0.02 ab | 0.63±0.02 b | 1.77±0.05 b | 1.76±0.05 c | |||
MD | 178.34±14.21 b | 167.06±10.89 b | 0.73±0.02 b | 0.79±0.01 b | 0.60±0.02 b | 0.52±0.03 c | 1.80±0.03 b | 1.98±0.03 b | |||
SD | 192.18±16.74 a | 178.03±11.36 a | 0.52±0.01 c | 0.61±0.02 c | 0.51±0.01 c | 0.38±0.00 d | 2.06±0.07 a | 2.24±0.06 a |
干旱处理 Drought stress | 水势 Water potential/MPa | 相对含水量 Relative water content/% | 相对电导率 Relative electrolyte leakage/% | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NP | F06 | NP | F06 | NP | F06 | |||
CK | –0.91±0.03 a | –0.91±0.02 a | 84.16±3.25 a | 84.52±6.27 a | 6.83±0.55 c | 6.81±0.34 c | ||
LD | –1.02±0.06 b | –0.93±0.05 a | 79.52±5.29 b | 82.80±4.22 a | 7.14±0.35 c | 6.92±0.41 c | ||
MD | –1.15±0.06 c | –1.07±0.04 b | 70.87±8.09 c | 76.33±6.30 b | 8.31±0.27 b | 7.52±0.17 b | ||
SD | –1.27±0.05 d | –1.16±0.04 c | 61.82±5.77 d | 67.27±7.06 c | 9.45±0.67 a | 8.48±0.19 a |
Table 3 Effect of different treatments on water potential, relative water content and relative electrolyte leakage of rice leaves.
干旱处理 Drought stress | 水势 Water potential/MPa | 相对含水量 Relative water content/% | 相对电导率 Relative electrolyte leakage/% | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NP | F06 | NP | F06 | NP | F06 | |||
CK | –0.91±0.03 a | –0.91±0.02 a | 84.16±3.25 a | 84.52±6.27 a | 6.83±0.55 c | 6.81±0.34 c | ||
LD | –1.02±0.06 b | –0.93±0.05 a | 79.52±5.29 b | 82.80±4.22 a | 7.14±0.35 c | 6.92±0.41 c | ||
MD | –1.15±0.06 c | –1.07±0.04 b | 70.87±8.09 c | 76.33±6.30 b | 8.31±0.27 b | 7.52±0.17 b | ||
SD | –1.27±0.05 d | –1.16±0.04 c | 61.82±5.77 d | 67.27±7.06 c | 9.45±0.67 a | 8.48±0.19 a |
干旱处理 Drought stress | 叶绿素a含量 Chlorophyll a content/(mg·g-1) | 叶绿素b含量 Chlorophyll b content/(mg·g-1) | 类胡萝卜素含量 Carotenoid content/(mg·g-1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NP | F06 | NP | F06 | NP | F06 | |||
CK | 3.65±0.04 a | 3.66±0.14 a | 0.86±0.00 a | 0.87±0.02 a | 1.22±0.02 a | 1.21±0.03 a | ||
LD | 3.61±0.05 a | 3.52±0.06 a | 0.85±0.03 a | 0.86±0.03 a | 1.17±0.01 a | 1.24±0.02 a | ||
MD | 3.55±0.01 a | 3.48±0.06 a | 0.84±0.01 a | 0.84±0.01 a | 0.91±0.01 b | 1.19±0.02 a | ||
SD | 3.08±0.06 b | 3.39±0.05 a | 0.78±0.01 b | 0.82±0.01 a | 0.73±0.02 c | 0.97±0.01 b |
Table 4 Effect of different treatments on photosynthetic pigment contents of rice leaves.
干旱处理 Drought stress | 叶绿素a含量 Chlorophyll a content/(mg·g-1) | 叶绿素b含量 Chlorophyll b content/(mg·g-1) | 类胡萝卜素含量 Carotenoid content/(mg·g-1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NP | F06 | NP | F06 | NP | F06 | |||
CK | 3.65±0.04 a | 3.66±0.14 a | 0.86±0.00 a | 0.87±0.02 a | 1.22±0.02 a | 1.21±0.03 a | ||
LD | 3.61±0.05 a | 3.52±0.06 a | 0.85±0.03 a | 0.86±0.03 a | 1.17±0.01 a | 1.24±0.02 a | ||
MD | 3.55±0.01 a | 3.48±0.06 a | 0.84±0.01 a | 0.84±0.01 a | 0.91±0.01 b | 1.19±0.02 a | ||
SD | 3.08±0.06 b | 3.39±0.05 a | 0.78±0.01 b | 0.82±0.01 a | 0.73±0.02 c | 0.97±0.01 b |
干旱处理 Drought stress | 细胞分裂素含量 Cytokinin content/(ng·g-1) | 脱落酸含量 Abscisic acid content/(ng·g-1) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶片 Leaf | 根系 Root | 叶片 Leaf | 根系 Root | ||||||||
NP | F06 | NP | F06 | NP | F06 | NP | F06 | ||||
CK | 180.32±24.50 a | 266.36±13.56 a | 31.34±2.12 a | 43.14±2.74 a | 423.56±65.56 c | 432.49±43.11 c | 448.34±32.16 a | 568.33±35.17 a | |||
LD | 159.02±19.63 b | 245.45±12.28 ab | 29.93±3.84 ab | 42.70±2.91 a | 438.05±22.49 c | 444.64±38.63 c | 440.99±22.98 a | 502.33±34.65 ab | |||
MD | 123.70±16.32 c | 153.92±18.58 b | 25.33±1.47 b | 36.06±3.09 b | 472.24±35.63 b | 498.86±51.26 b | 443.32±45.23 a | 491.03±26.54 b | |||
SD | 93.83±10.61 d | 118.35±16.07 c | 20.76±3.61 c | 29.15±1.58 c | 526.15±1.58 a | 567.27±37.82 a | 436.40±31.63 a | 423.01±24.29 c |
Table 5 Effect of different treatments on cytokinins and abscisic acid concentrations of rice.
干旱处理 Drought stress | 细胞分裂素含量 Cytokinin content/(ng·g-1) | 脱落酸含量 Abscisic acid content/(ng·g-1) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶片 Leaf | 根系 Root | 叶片 Leaf | 根系 Root | ||||||||
NP | F06 | NP | F06 | NP | F06 | NP | F06 | ||||
CK | 180.32±24.50 a | 266.36±13.56 a | 31.34±2.12 a | 43.14±2.74 a | 423.56±65.56 c | 432.49±43.11 c | 448.34±32.16 a | 568.33±35.17 a | |||
LD | 159.02±19.63 b | 245.45±12.28 ab | 29.93±3.84 ab | 42.70±2.91 a | 438.05±22.49 c | 444.64±38.63 c | 440.99±22.98 a | 502.33±34.65 ab | |||
MD | 123.70±16.32 c | 153.92±18.58 b | 25.33±1.47 b | 36.06±3.09 b | 472.24±35.63 b | 498.86±51.26 b | 443.32±45.23 a | 491.03±26.54 b | |||
SD | 93.83±10.61 d | 118.35±16.07 c | 20.76±3.61 c | 29.15±1.58 c | 526.15±1.58 a | 567.27±37.82 a | 436.40±31.63 a | 423.01±24.29 c |
[1] | 丁雷, 李英瑞, 李勇, 沈其荣, 郭世伟.梯度干旱胁迫对水稻叶片光合和水分状况的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2014, 28(1): 65-70. |
Ding L, Li Y R, Li Y, Shen Q R, Guo S W.Effects of drought stress on photosynthesis and water status of rice leaves.Chin J Rice Sci, 2014, 28(1): 65-70.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[2] | 胡继杰, 朱练峰, 钟楚, 林育炯, 张均华, 曹小闯, 禹盛苗, James A B, 金千瑜. 增氧模式对水稻光合特性及产量的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2017, 31(3): 278-287. |
Hu J J, Zhu L F, Zhong C, Lin Y J, Zhang J H, Cao X C, Yu S M. Allen B J, Jin Q Y.Effects of aeration methods on photosynthetic characteristics and yield of rice.Chin J Rice Sci, 2017, 31(3): 278-287.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[3] | 康贻军, 程洁, 梅丽娟, 胡健, 朴哲, 殷士. 植物根际促生菌作用机制研究进展. 应用生态学报, 2010, 21( 1): 232-238. |
Kang Y J, Cheng J, Mei L J, Hu J, Piao Z, Yin S.Action mechanisms of plant growth promoting rhizobacterial (PGPR).Chin J Appl Ecol, 2010, 21(1): 232-238. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] | Abbasi M K, Sharif S, Kazmi M, Sultan T, Aslam M.Isolation of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria from wheat rhizosphere and their effect on improving growth, yield and nutrient uptake of plants.Plant Biosys, 2011, 145(1): 159-168. |
[5] | Carvalhais L C, Dennis P G, Fedoseyenko D, Hajirezaei M R, Borriss R, von Wirén N V. Root exudation of sugars, amino acids and organic acids by maize as affected by nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and iron deficiency.J Plant Nut Soil Sci, 2011, 174(1): 3-11. |
[6] | Kasim W A, Osman M E, Omar M N, El-Daim I A A, Be jais, Meijer J. Control of drought stress in wheat using plant-growth-promoting bacteria.J Plant Growth Reg, 2013, 32(1): 122-130. |
[7] | 刘方春, 马海林, 马丙尧, 杜振宇, 井大炜, 邢尚军. 干旱环境下接种根际促生细菌对核桃苗光合特性的影响. 林业科学, 2015, 51(7): 84-90. |
Liu F C, Ma H L, Ma B Y, Du Z Y, Jing D W, Xing S G.Effect of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on photosynthetic characteristics in walnut seedlings under drought stress.Sci Sil Sin, 2015, 51(7): 84-90. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | 郭贵华, 刘海艳, 李刚华, 刘明, 李岩, 王绍华, 刘正辉, 唐设, 丁艳锋. ABA 缓解水稻孕穗期干旱胁迫生理特性的分析. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(22): 4380-4391. |
Guo G H, Liu H Y, Li G H, Liu M, Li Y, Wang S H, Liu Z H, Tang S, Ding Y F.Analysis of physiological characteristics about ABA alleviating rice booting stage drought stress.Sci Agric Sin, 2014, 47(22): 4380-4391. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] | Arkhipova T N, Prinsen E, Veselov S U, Martinenko E V, Melentiev A I.Cytokinin producing bacteria enhance plant growth in drying soil.Plant Soil, 2007, 292: 305-315. |
[10] | Kasim W A, Osman M E, Omar M N, El-Daim I A A, Bejai S, Meijer J. Control of drought stress in wheat using plant-growth-promoting bacteria.J Plant Growth Reg, 2013, 32(1): 122-130. |
[11] | Huang M, Guo Z.Responses of antioxidative system to chilling stress in two rice cultivars differing in sensitivity.Biol Plant, 2005, 49(1): 81-84. |
[12] | 欧立军, 陈波, 邹学校. 干旱对辣椒光合作用及相关生理特性的影响. 生态学报, 2012, 32(8): 2612-2619. |
Ou L J, Chen B, Zou X X.Effects of drought stress on photosynthesis and associated physiological characters of pepper. Acta Ecol Sin, 2012, 32(8): 2612-2619. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | Guerfel M, Baccouri O, Boujnah D, Chaibi W, Zarrouk M.Impacts of water stress on gas exchange, water relations, chlorophyll content and leaf structure in the two main Tunisian olive (Olea europaea L.) cultivars. Sci Hort, 2009, 119(3): 257-263. |
[14] | Johnson J D, Tognetti R, Paris P.Water relations and gas exchange in poplar and willow under water stress and elevated atmospheric CO2.Physiol Plant, 2002, 115(1): 93-100. |
[15] | 邵在胜, 赵轶鹏, 宋琪玲, 贾一磊, 王云霞, 杨连新, 王余龙. 大气CO2和O3浓度升高对水稻汕优63叶片光合作用的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2014, 22(4): 422-429. |
Shao Z S, Zhao Y P, Song Q L, Jia Y L, Wang Y X, Yang L X, Wang Y L.Impact of elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide and ozone concentrations on leaf photosynthesis of ‘Shanyou 63’ hybrid rice. Chin J Eco-Agric, 2014, 22(4): 422-429. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | Lichtenthaler H K.Chlorophylls and carotenoids: pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes.Methods Enzymol, 1987, 148: 349-382. |
[17] | 刘方春, 马海林, 杜振宇, 马丙尧, 井大炜, 邢尚军. 金银花容器苗对干旱胁迫下接种根际促生细菌的生理响应. 生态学报, 2015, 35(21): 7003-7010. |
Liu F C, Ma H L, Du Z Y, Ma B Y, Jing D W, Xing S G.Physiological responses of Lonicera japonica container seedlings to plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria inoculation under drought stress.Acta Ecol Sin, 2015, 35(21): 7003-7010. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] | 刘海艳, 杨丽洁, 丁艳锋, 李刚华, 王绍华, 刘正辉, 唐设, 刘仁梅, 蒋卫红. NO 对水稻孕穗期干旱胁迫下叶片光合及产量的影响. 南京农业大学学报, 2017, 40(2): 195-202. |
Liu H Y, Yang L J, Ding Y F, Li G G, Wang S H, Liu Z H, Tang S, Liu R M, Jiang W H.Effects of nitric oxide on photosynthesis and yield of rice under drought stress at booting stage. J Nanjing Agric Univ, 2017, 40(2): 195-202. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | Bartošková H, Komenda J, Nauš J.Functional changes of photosystemⅡ in the mossRhizomnium punctatum(Hedw.) induced by different rates of dark desiccation. J Plant Physiol, 1999, 154(5) : 597-604. |
[20] | 张金政, 张起源, 孙国峰, 何卿, 李晓东, 刘洪章. 干旱胁迫及复水对玉簪生长和光合作用的影响. 草业学报, 2014, 23(1): 167-176. |
Zhang J Z, Zhang Q V, Sun G F, He Q, Li X D, Liu H Z.Effects of drought stress and re-watering on growth and photosynthesis of Hosta. Acta Pratacul Sin, 2014, 23(1): 167-176. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] | 赵琴, 潘静, 曹兵, 宋丽华. 气温升高与干旱胁迫对宁夏枸杞光合作用的影响. 生态学报, 2015, 35(18): 6016-6022. |
Zhao Q, Pan J, Cao B, Song L H.Effects of elevated temperature and drought stress on photosynthesis of Lycium barbarum. Acta Ecol Sin, 2015, 35(18): 6016-6022. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[22] | Brugiere N, Jiao S, Hantke S.Cytokinin oxidase gene expression in maize is localized to the vasculature, and is induced by cytokinins, abscisic acid, and abiotic stress.Plant Physio1, 2003, 132: 1228-1240. |
[23] | 李长宁, Manoj K S, 农倩, 李杨瑞. 水分胁迫下外源 ABA 提高甘蔗抗旱性的作用机制. 作物学报, 2010, 36(5): 863-870. |
Li C N, Manoj K S, Nong Q, Li Y R.Mechanism of tolerance to drought in sugarcane plant enhanced by foliage dressing of abscisic acid under water stress. Acta Agron Sin, 2010, 36(5): 863-870. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | Kwak K S, Lijima M, Yamauchi A.Changes with aging of endogenous abscisic acid and zeatin riboside in the root system of rice.Jpn J Crop Sci, 1996, 65: 686-692. |
[25] | Dodd I C, Davies W J.The relationship between leaf growth and ABA accumulation in the grass leaf elongation zone.J Exp Bot, 1996, 45: 1471-1478. |
[26] | 王玮, 张枫, 李德全,. 外源ABA 对渗透胁迫下玉米幼苗根系渗透调节的影响. 作物学报, 2002, 28(1): 121-126. |
Wang W, Zhang F, Li D Q.The effects of exogenous ABA on osmotic adjustment in maize roots under osmotic stress.Acta Agron Sin, 2002, 28(1): 121-126. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[27] | 阮英慧, 董守坤, 刘丽君, 孙聪姝, 王立彬, 郭茜茜, 盖志佳. 干旱胁迫下外源脱落酸对大豆花期生理特性的影响. 大豆科学, 2012, 31(3): 385-389. |
Ruan Y H, Dong S K, Liu L J, Sun C S, Wang L B, Guo Q Q, Gai Z J.Effects of exogenous abscisic acid on physiological characteristics in soybean flowering under drought stress. Soyb Sci, 2012, 31(3): 385-389. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[28] | Heckenberger U, Schurr U, Schulze E D.Stomatal response to ABA fed into the xylem of intactHeliarthus annuus(L) Plant. J Exp Bot, 1996, 47: 1405-1412. |
[29] | Liang J, Zhang J, Wong M H.How do roots control xylem sap ABA concentration in response to soil drying?Plant Cell Physiol, 1997, 38: 10-16. |
[30] | 周宇飞, 王德权, 陆樟镳, 王娜, 王艺陶, 李丰先, 许文娟, 黄瑞冬. 干旱胁迫对持绿性高粱光合特性和内源激素ABA、CTK 含量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(4): 655-663. |
Zhou Y F, Wang D Q, Lu Z B, Wang N, Wang Y T, Li F X, Xu W J, Huang R D.Effects of drought stress on photosynthetic characteristics and endogenous hormone ABA and CTK contents in green-stayed sorghum.Sci Agric Sin, 2014, 47(4): 655-663. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | REN Zhiqi, XUE Kexin, DONG Zheng, LI Xiaoxiang, LI Yongzhao, GUO Yujing, LIU Wenqiang, GUO Liang, SHENG Xinnian, LIU Zhixi, PAN Xiaowu. Identification and Gene Mapping of Outcurved Leaf Mutant ocl1 in Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 337-346. |
[2] | XIAO Lequan, LI Lei, DAI Weimin, QIANG Sheng, SONG Xiaoling. Seedling Growth Characteristics of Hybrids Between Transgenic Rice with cry2A*/bar Genes and Weedy Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 347-358. |
[3] | LI Gang, GAO Qingsong, LI Wei, ZHANG Wenxia, WANG Jian, CHEN Baoshan, WANG Di, GAO Hao, XU Weijun, CHEN Hongqi, JI Jianhui. Directed Knockout of SD1 Gene Improves Lodging Resistance and Blast Resistance of Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 359-367. |
[4] | WANG Shengyong, CHEN Yuhang, CHEN Huili, HUANG Yujie, ZHANG Xiaotian, DING Shuangcheng, WANG Hongwei. Effects of High Temperature on Phenylpropane Metabolism and Downstream Branch Metabolic Pathways in Rice Meiosis [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 368-378. |
[5] | HUANG Yaru, XU Peng, WANG Lele, HE Yizhe, WANG Hui, KE Jian, HE Haibing, WU Liquan, YOU Cuicui. Effects of Exogenous Trehalose on Grain Filling Characteristics and Yield Formation of japonica Rice Cultivar W1844 [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 379-391. |
[6] | DONG Liqiang, YANG Tiexin, LI Rui, SHANG Wenqi, MA Liang, LI Yuedong, SUI Guomin. Effect of Plant-row Spacing on Rice Yield and Root Morphological and Physiological Characteristics in Super High Yield Field [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 392-404. |
[7] | GAO Qianqing, REN Xiaojian, ZHAI Zhongbing, ZHENG Pubing, WU Yuanfen, CUI Kehui. Effects of Panicle and Bud-promoting Nitrogen Fertilizer Application on Growth of Regenerated Bud and Grain Yield of Ratoon Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 405-414. |
[8] | HUANG Jinwen, LI Rikun, CHEN Zhicheng, ZHANG Bianhong, LEI Han, PAN Ruixin, YANG Mingyu, PAN Meiqing, TANG Lina. Effects of Straw Returning Techniques on Soil Nutrients, Organic Carbon and Microbial Diversity in Tobacco-rice Rotation System [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 415-426. |
[9] | HAN Cong, HE Yuchang, WU Lijuan, JIA Lili, WANG Lei, E Zhiguo. Research Progress in the Function of Basic Leucine Zipper (bZIP) Protein Family in Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 436-448. |
[10] | SHEN Yumin, CHEN Mingliang, XIONG Huanjin, XIONG Wentao, WU Xiaoyan, XIAO Yeqing. Phenotypic Analysis and Fine Mapping of blg1(beak like grain 1), a Rice Mutant with Abnormal Palea and Lemma Development [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 225-232. |
[11] | DUAN Min, XIE Liujie, GAO Xiuying, TANG Haijuan, HUANG Shanjun, PAN Xiaobiao. Creation of Thermo-sensitive Genic Male Sterile Rice Lines with Wide Compatibility Based on CRISPR/Cas9 Technology [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 233-243. |
[12] | WANG Wenting, MA Jiaying, LI Guangyan, FU Weimeng, LI Hubo, LIN Jie, CHEN Tingting, FENG Baohua, TAO Longxing, FU Guanfu, QIN Yebo. Effect of Different Fertilizer Application Rates on Rice Yield and Quality Formation and Its Relationship with Energy Metabolism at High Temperature [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 253-264. |
[13] | LIU Aihua, LI Xiaokun. Meta-analysis of Relationship Between Fertilizer Application and Rice Quality [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 276-284. |
[14] | YANG Xiaolong, WANG Biao, WANG Benfu, ZHANG Zhisheng, ZHANG Zuolin, YANG Lantian, CHENG Jianping, LI Yang. Effects of Different Water Management on Yield and Rice Quality of Dry-seeded Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 285-294. |
[15] | WEI Xiaodong, SONG Xuemei, ZHAO Ling, ZHAO Qingyong, CHEN Tao, LU Kai, ZHU Zhen, HUANG Shengdong, WANG Cailin, ZHANG Yadong. Effects of Silicon and Zinc Fertilizer and Their Application Ways on Yield and Grain Quality of Rice Variety Nanjing 46 [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 295-306. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||